烟感探头测试工具/SOLO 332

　　天厦(厦门)国际贸易有限公司坐落于美丽的海滨城市—厦门,专注于欧美进口机电设备及其零配件销售公司主要经营产品包括：泵、阀等各种液压设备;顶驱配件、电机等设备;编码器、传感器等各种高低压电器：以及各种电机马达、传动控制、开关插座等各种工矿产品和备件，并依托国外厂商的支持为用户提供质优价廉的产品及完善到位的技术服务。服务领域涵盖油田、矿山、钢铁、能源、化工、船舶、电力、机械制造等行业。

　　today the fire precautions (Workplace) Regulations 1997 places a clear legal responsibility on the ‘user’1 of a building for the fire safety of that building (and its occupants) including the maintenance of fire safety equipment and, within this, the fire detection and alarm system. Soon, however, there will be newer and even clearer legislation by way of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order (commonly referred to as the RRO, occasionally as the FSO and, in this article, the ‘Order’). The draft was laid before Parliament on the 10th May 2004 and the final Order is anticipated to come into effect early next year. When it does, it will amend or replace 118 pieces of legislation, the most significant being the repeal of the Fire Precautions Act 1971 and the revocation of Fire Precautions (Workplace) Regulations 1997 (which, in many ways, it develops and extends). In reality however, the responsibilities for good maintenance exist now and do not change under the Order. Further, now and under the Order, the responsibilities of the ‘user’ in current and impending legislation are focussed on the ‘Responsible Person’2 . Today, it must be true to say that relatively few users and even fewer responsible persons (or perhaps even the other way round!) are truly clear on their responsibilities (either pre or post THE VALUE OF GOOD MAINTENANCE PART I: RESPONSIBILITIES AND KEY ASPECTS the Order). The responsibilities are however, both clear and significant. Moreover, under the Order (which applies to the majority of premises and workplaces in the UK) there is, in addition to clear responsibilities, endorsement for the enforcing authority – normally the fire brigade but possibly also the HSE, MOD or local authority – to ensure it is enacted. Should the responsibilities not be met, the penalties range from fines to prison sentences.

　　烟感探头测试工具/SOLO 332

　　如今，1997年《消防(工作场所)条例》明确规定，建筑物的“使用者”1对该建筑物(及其居住者)的消防安全负有法律责任，包括维护消防安全设备以及在此范围内的火灾探测和报警系统。然而，很快，通过监管改革(消防安全)命令(通常称为RRO，有时称为FSO，在本文中称为“命令”)将有更新甚至更清晰的立法。该草案于2004年5月10日提交议会审议，蕞终命令预计将于明年年初生效。当它这样做时，它将修改或替换118条立法，蕞重要的是废除1971年《消防法》和1997年《消防(工作场所)条例》(在许多方面，它发展和扩展)。然而，在现实中，良好维护的责任现在已经存在，并且不会在订单下改变。此外，现在和根据该命令，“用户”在当前和即将出台的法律中的责任集中在“责任人”2上。今天，必须说的是，相对较少的用户和更少的负责人(或者甚至相反!)明确他们的责任(无论是前期还是后期良好维护的价值第壹部分：责任和订单的关键方面)。然而，责任是明确的和重要的。此外，根据该命令(适用于英国的大多数房屋和工作场所)，除了明确的责任外，还有对执行机构(通常是消防队，也可能是健康、安全、国防部或地方当局)的认可，以确保其得到颁布。如果不履行责任，处罚范围从罚款到。

　　Specialist help The Order is not, however, an unrealistic piece of legislation. Recognising that the Responsible Person cannot be expected to “do the whole job himself and alone” the Order indicates that the “the Responsible Person must … appoint one or more Competent Persons to assist him…” while explaining that the competent person must have “… sufficient training, experience and knowledge…” The Competent Person3 could be anyone from a company fire warden to a fire alarm service engineer. They may be directly employed or be a subcontractor but the important word is competent (see panel for definitions). In the case of fire alarm systems, Competent Persons are (or should be) more often than not in the form of organisations which specialise in the business of fire detection and alarm systems.

　　烟感探头测试工具/SOLO 332

　　然而，专家帮助秩序并不是不切实际的立法。意识到责任人不可能“独自完成整个工作”，该命令表明“责任人必须……指定一个或多个胜任的人来协助他……”，同时解释说胜任的人必须“具备……足够的培训、经验和知识……”人员3可以是从公司消防管理员到火 务工程师的任何人。他们可以直接受雇或是分包商，但重要的词是胜任的(定义见小组)。就火灾报警系统而言，合格人员通常(或应该)是专门从事火灾探测和报警系统业务的组织。